نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 No.2, Abtin Building, Moazen Alley, Shohadaye khajoo Street, Esfahan

2 دانشگاه شهرکرد

3 دانشیار گروه مهندسی آب، دانشگاه شهرکرد

10.22103/nrswe.2023.21236.1034

چکیده

تبخیرتعرق مرجع (ET0)، حداکثر مقدار آب خروجی برای یک پوشش گیاهی به‌خصوص (مثل چمن، یونجه یا یک سطح کشت استاندارد) است. تاکید فائو 56، بر اندازه‌گیری پارامترهای هواشناسی در ارتفاع دو متری بالای چمن سبزی است که در سطح وسیع کشت شده، زمین را به طور کامل پوشانده و فاقد کمبود آب باشد. رابطه پنمن مانتیث فائو (PMFAO) برای محاسبه ET0 پیشنهاد شد. در ایستگاه‌های هواشناسی کشاورزی که محصور در مناطق تحت کشت ساخته می‌شوند، دستگاه‌های اندازه‌گیری برخلاف ایستگاه‌های سینوپتیک شرایط هواشناسی مشابه با گیاهان پیرامون ایستگاه را ثبت می‌کنند. ازاین‌رو در گزارش فائو، روش جایگزین برای محاسبه ET0 توصیه نمی‌شود. در پژوهش حاضر روش هارگریوز_سامانی (HS) و روش PMFAO، در دوره زمانی 25 ساله از 1995 تا 2019 به صورت روزانه در حوضه زاینده‌رود (29 ایستگاه) مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد در گام زمانی روزانه اختلاف دو روش زیاد (ضریب نش از 63/0 تا 87/0) است. در گام ماهیانه، اختلاف دو روش به‌طورکلی قابل ‌اغماض است (ضریب نش از 8/0 تا 96/0). در گام‌های سالانه (ضریب نش بالای 8/0) نتایج دو روش بسیار نزدیک به هم هستند. ولی در ایستگاه‌های مختلف رفتار مشابهی دیده نشد. به‌عنوان مثال در ایستگاه کبوترآباد برعکس ایستگاه شرق اصفهان همواره ET0 به روش HS از PMFAO بیشتر است. بنابراین در عمل برای تخمین ET0 به روش HS توصیه می‌شود حداقل با نزدیک‌ترین ایستگاه سینوپتیک و با روش PMFAO صحت سنجی شده و پس از ارزیابی به کار گرفته شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparison of the Daily, Monthly and Annual Time Steps in Hargreaves-Samani and Penman-Monteith-FAO Models to Estimate Reference Evapotranspiration in the ZayandehRud Basin

نویسندگان [English]

  • Esmaeil Adib Majd 1
  • Rasoul Mirabbasi 2
  • Mehdi Asadi 2
  • Sayed Hassan Tabatabaei 3

1 No.2, Abtin Building, Moazen Alley, Shohadaye khajoo Street, Esfahan

2 Department of Water Engineering, Shahrekord University

3 Shahrekord University

چکیده [English]

Reference evapotranspiration (ET0) is the maximum amount of water transpiration for a particular vegetation cover (such as grass, alfalfa, or a standard crop area). FAO 56 report emphasis, is on measuring meteorological parameters at a height of two meters above green grass. Cultivation around the station should be on a wide area and there is no shortage of water. Agricultural meteorological stations covering a certain territory around them record the same meteorological conditions as the surrounding plants. The Penman-Monteith-FAO (PMFAO) equation was proposed to calculate ET0 and the use of alternative method was not recommended. In the present research, the Hargreaves-Samani (HS) method and the PMFAO method were evaluated on daily, Monthly and yearly time steps in the ZayandehRud basin over a period of 25 years from 1995 to 2019. The results showed that in the daily time step, the difference between the two methods is large (Nash coefficient from 0.63 to 0.87). In the monthly time step, the difference is generally negligible (Nash coefficient from 0.8 to 0.96). In annual time step (Nash coefficient above 0.8), the results are very close to each other. But in different stations, the same behavior was not seen, for example, in Kabutrabad station, in contrast to East Isfahan station, almost always, ET0 by HS method is higher than PMFAO. Therefore, in practice, to use ET0 by HS method, it is recommended to verify and evaluate at least with the nearest synoptic station and PMFAO method and then use it.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Reference evapotranspiration
  • Zayandehrud Basin
  • Penman- Monteith FAO method
  • Hargreaves Samani method
  • Evaporation pan coefficient
  • Reference evapotranspiration iso map
  1. Allen R.G. 1996. Assessing integrity of data for reference evapotranspiration estimation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 122(2):97-106. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1996)122:2(97)
  2. Allen R.G., Pereira L.S., Raes D. and Smith M. 1998. FAO Irrigation and drainage paper No. 56. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 56(97).
  3. Almorox J., Quej V., and Marti P. 2015. Global performance ranking of temperature-based approaches for evapotranspiration estimation considering Koppen climate classes. Journal of Hydrology, 528:514-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.057
  4. Blaney H.F., and Criddle W.D. 1950. Determining Water Requirements in Irrigated area from climatological irrigation data. US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington.
  5. Hargreaves G.H., and Samani Z.A. 1985. Reference crop evapotranspiration from ambient air Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 1:96-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.26773
  6. Hargreaves G.H. 1975. Moisture availability and crop production. Transactions of the ASAE, 18(5):980-0984. doi: 10.13031/2013.36722
  7. Hargreaves G.H., and Allen R.G. 2003. History and evaluation of Hargreaves evapotranspiration equation. Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering, 129(1):53-63. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2003)129:1(53)
  8. Jensen M.E., and Haise H.R. 1963. Estimating evapotranspiration from solar radiation. Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division, 89:15-41. https://doi.org/10.1061/JRCEA4.0000287
  9. Majidi M., Alizadeh A., Vazifedoust M., Farid A., and Ahmadi T. 2015. Analysis of the effect of missing weather data on estimating daily reference evapotranspiration under different climatic conditions. Water Resources Management, 29:2107-2124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0782-0
  10. Monteith J.L. 1981. Evaporation and surface temperature. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 107(451):1-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49710745102
  11. Moratiel R., Bravo R., Saa A., Tarquis A. M., and Almorox J. 2020. Estimation of evapotranspiration by the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Penman–Monteith temperature (PMT) and Hargreaves–Samani (HS) models under temporal and spatial criteria–a case study in Duero basin (Spain). Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 20(3):859-875.‌ https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-859-2020, 2020
  12. Moreno-Tejera S., Ramirez-Santigosa L. and Silva-Perez M.A. 2015. A proposed methodology for quick assessment of timestamp and quality control results of solar radiation data. Renewable Energy, 78:531-537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.01.031
  13. Niranjan S., and Nandagiri L. 2021. Effect of local calibration on the performance of the Hargreaves reference crop evapotranspiration equation. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 12(6):2654-2673.‌ https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2021.360
  14. Penman H.L. 1948. Natural evaporation from open water bare soil and grass. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 193(1032):120-145. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1948.0037
  15. Priestley C.H.B. and Taylor R.J. 1972. On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Monthly weather review, 100(2):81-92.
  16. Raziei T. and Pereira L.S. 2013. Estimation of ETo with Hargreaves–Samani and FAO-PM temperature methods for a wide range of climates in Iran. Agricultural water management, 121:1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.12.019
  17. Rodrigues G.C., and Braga R.P. 2021. Estimation of reference evapotranspiration during the irrigation season using nine temperature-based methods in a hot-summer Mediterranean climate. Agriculture, 11(2):124-150. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11020124
  18. Shah S. A. 2022. Hargreaves-Samani method: Estimation of historical annual, seasonal, and monthly Reference Evapotranspiration (ETo) in Dadu District Pakistan. Journal of Applied Research in Water and Wastewater, 9(1):30-39.‌ https://arww.razi.ac.ir/article_2173.html#:~:text=10.22126/arww.2022.7533.1237

19.Talebmorad H., Ahmadnejad A., Eslamian S., Ostad-Ali-Askari K., and Singh V. P. 2020. Evaluation of uncertainty in evapotranspiration values by FAO56-Penman-Monteith and Hargreaves-Samani methods. International Journal of Hydrology Science and Technology, 10(2):135-147. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHST.2020.106481

  1. Thornthwaite C.W. 1948. An Approach toward a Rational Classification of Climate. Geographical Review, 38:55-94. https://doi.org/10.2307/210739
  2. Walter I.A., Allen R.G., Elliott R., Itenfisu D., Brown P., Jensen M.E., Mecham B., Howell T.A., Snyder R., Eching S., and Spofford T. 2005. Task committee on standardization of reference evapotranspiration. ASCE Reston, USA. https://www.academia.edu/download/40733466/ASCE_method.pdf
  3. Xia X., Zhu X., Pan Y., and Zhang J. 2020. A monthly regression correction model for the Hargreaves–Samani method in Mainland China. Irrigation and Drainage, 69(4):880-890.‌ https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2445