نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری علوم و مهندسی منابع آب، دانشگاه تبریز

2 شرکت آب منطقه ای آذربایجان غربی

10.22103/nrswe.2023.21590.1039

چکیده

نظام بهره‌برداری از شبکه‌های آبیاری و زهکشی می‌تواند در انتخاب نوع ابزار اندازه‌گیری و بهره‌برداری آن مؤثر باشد. انتخاب ابزارهای اندازه‌گیری جریان به عواملی مانند دقت مورد نیاز، هزینه، الزامات حفاظتی و نگهداری، ملاحظات هیدرولیکی، تطبیق با شرایط بهره‌برداری و ... بستگی دارد. هدف از این تحقیق مقایسه کاربردی روش‌های مختلف اندازه‌گیری پارامترهای هیدرولیکی جریان در شبکه‌های آبیاری در حال بهره‌برداری به منظور تعیین مناسب‌ترین ابزار جهت اندازه‌گیری دبی می‌باشد. در این تحقیق دستگاه‌ مکانیکی مولینه (MO)، دستگاه الکترونیکی دبی سنج پرتابل التراسونیک مجهز به ارتفاع‌سنج فشاری (CC) و دستگاه الکترونیکی دبی سنج راداری مجهز به ارتفاع‌سنج التراسونیک (OFR) در یک نقطه مشترک و ثابت در کانال ساحل چپ شبکه آبیاری و زهکشی مهاباد (LMC) در سه تراز سطح آب 6/0، 1 و 2/1 متری مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفتند. نتایج نشان داد تغییرات متوسط دبی محاسباتی ادوات اندازه­گیری MO، CC و OFR در تراز 6/0 و 1 متری در حدود 23% گردید. در تراز 2/1 متری به دلیل افزایش گذر حجمی جریان، تشکیل امواج سطحی و الگوی جریان مناسب؛ تغییرات دبی دستگاه‌های OFR و CC کمتر از 5% بوده که بر اساس ماهیت سنجش تجهیزات نشان از دقت قابل قبول هر دو می‌باشد. ضمناً می‌توان اذعان نمود که دستگاه OFR با کالیبراسیون دوره‌ای توسط دستگاه CC می‌تواند به‌عنوان ابزاری مفید در سنجش پارامترهای دبی، سرعت و ارتفاع سطح آب استفاده گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the Performance of Electronic and Mechanical Measuring Devices in Measuring Flow Hydraulic Parameters (Case Study: Mahabad Irrigation and Drainage Network)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Morteza Samadian 1
  • Yaghob Azhdan 2
  • Mohammad Ashrafi geshlagi 2

1 PhD Candidate in Water Resources Science and Engineering, Tabriz University

2 West Azerbaijan Regional Water Company

چکیده [English]

The exploitation system of irrigation and drainage networks can be effective in choosing the type of measurement tool and its exploitation. The selection of flow measurement tools depends on factors such as required accuracy, cost, protection and maintenance requirements, hydraulic considerations, adaptation to operating conditions, etc. The purpose of this research is to compare the practical methods of measuring the hydraulic parameters of flow in irrigation networks in operation in order to determine the most suitable tool for measuring flow. In this research, the flow meter mechanical device (MO), an electronic portable ultrasonic flow meter device equipped with an pressure altimeter (CC) and electronic radar flow meter device equipped with ultrasonic altimeter (OFR) an common and fixed point in the left bank channel of the irrigation and drainage network Mahabad (LMC) were evaluated at three water levels of 0.6, 1 and 1.2 meters. The results showed that the average flow rate changes of MO, CC and OFR measuring instruments at 0.6 and 1 meter levels were about 23%. At the level of 1.2 meters due to the increase in flow volume, the formation of surface waves and the proper flow pattern; the flow rate changes of OFR and CC devices are less than 5%, which shows the acceptable accuracy of both devices based on the nature of the measurement equipment. In addition, it can be acknowledged that the OFR device with periodic calibration by the CC device can be used as a useful tool in measuring the parameters of flow, velocity and water level height.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Evaluation
  • Measurement
  • Hydraulic parameter Radar flow meter
  • Ultrasonic flow meter
  • Flow meter
  1. Asres, Sisay B. 2016. Evaluating and enhancing irrigation water management in the upper Blue Nile basin, Ethiopia: The case of Koga large scale irrigation scheme. Agricultural Water Management, 170(C): 26-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.10.025.
  2. Barkhordari S., Shahadany S.H., Taghvaeian S., Firoozfar A.R., and Maestre J.M. 2020. Reducing losses in earthen agricultural water conveyance and distribution systems by employing automatic control systems. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 1(168), 105-122. https://doi.org/1016/j.compag.2019.105122.
  3. Bechle, A. J., and Wu, C. 2014. An entropy-based surface velocity method for estuarine discharge measurement. Water Resources Research, 50, 6106–6128. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015353.
  4. Chen, FW., and Liu, CW.2020. Assessing the applicability of flow measurement by using non-contact observation methods in open channels. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192(5), 289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-8226-1.
  5. Chen YC, Yang TM, Hsu NS and Kuo TM. 2012. Real-time discharge measurement in tidal streams by an index velocity. Environ Monit Assess, 184(10):6423-36. doi: 10.1007/s10661-011-2430-y. Epub 2011 Nov 29. PMID: 22124583.
  6. Deputy of Technical, Infrastructure and Production Affairs & Department of Technical & Executive Affairs, Consultants and Contractors (Program and budget publication number 833). 2021. Selection and Operation Criteria for Water Measuring Equipment in Irrigation and Drainage Networks, Plan and Budget Organization, Iran. p. 31–43 (In Persian)
  7. ISO 15769 .2010. Hydrometry - Guidelines for the application of acoustic velocity meters using the Doppler and echo correlation methods.
  8. Kianmehr H., Jangi Marni A., Najafi B., and Ramezani H. 2016. The use of flow measurement method equipped with data transmission tool in irrigation networks, 15th Iranian Hydraulic Conference, Technical and Engineering Faculty, Imam Khomeini International University. Qazvin, Iran. (In Persian)
  9. Lozano D. and Mateos L. 2009. Field evaluation of ultrasonic flow meters for measuring water discharge in irrigation canals. Irrigation and Drainage. 58: 189–198.
  10. Mohammadi, A., Parvaresh Rizi, A., and Abbasi, N. 2019. Field measurement and analysis of water losses at the main and tertiary levels of irrigation canals: Varamin Irrigation Scheme, Iran. Global Ecology and Conservation, 1(18), e00646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00646
  11. Mohammadi J., Akbarian H., Samadian M. 2019. Determining the Discharg-Height relationship using cross correlation profiler technology. 3rd Iranian National Conference on Hydrology. University of Tabriz,Tabriz, Iran. (In Persian).
  12. Morlock S.E., Nguyen H.T., and Ross J.H. 2002. Feasibility of Acoustic Doppler Velocity Meters for the Production of Discharge Records from US Geological Survey Stream Flow-Gauging Stations. Water Resources Investigations Report, 01-4157, Denver, Colorado. https://doi.org/10.3133/wri20014157.
  13. Paoletti M., Pellegrini M., Belli A., Pierleoni P., Sini F., Pezzotta N., and Palma L.2023. Discharge Monitoring in Open-Channels: An Operational Rating Curve Management Tool. Sensors, 23(4):2035. doi: 10.3390/s23042035.
  14. Samadian M., Akbarian H., and Mohammadi J. 2019. Determining the most suitable place for calibration of long throat flume structure using CC profiler and HEC-RAS model, 1th international congress and the fourth national congress of irrigation and drainage of Iran. Urmia, Iran. (In Persian).
  15. Scherelis C., Penesis I., Hemer MA., Cossu R., and Wright JT.2020. Dataset for concurrent echo sounder and ADCP measurements at a tidal energy candidate site in Australia. Data in Brief, 31:105873. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105873.
  16. Sojodi Z., and Hashemi Shahdani M. 2021. Review of Water Conveyance and Distribution Efficiency in Irrigation Networks in Iran and its Estimation Methods, Journal of Environmental Research and Technology, 6 (9), 75-87. (In Persian).